View Thread Return to Index Previous Next

MiYard Cyber Club Message Board Archive

Well, I would say...
By:ray
Date: 10/19/08 7:30pm
In Response To: Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h (Roger)

...depending on who one supports, one probably knows more about that candidate, and as such, the perception will be the other side is distoring more and being more negative.

As for a teeter totter, simply speaking, two wrongs do not make a right.

That realization has helped me tremendously in ceasing to engage or respond to certain happenings around here.

By the way, I heard you deleted a rather awful thread about me. While I don't know what that was, nor do I want to, and even though I did not ask for it to be removed, thanks Roger. Irie.

Messages In This Thread

Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of human -- Lola -- 10/19/08 12:21pm
Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h -- ray -- 10/19/08 1:41pm
Both say no litmus test but both have one -- Lola -- 10/20/08 10:59am
Re: Both say no litmus test but both have one -- Roger -- 10/20/08 1:33pm
Re: Both say no litmus test but both have one -- ray -- 10/20/08 2:52pm
Re: Both say no litmus test but both have one -- Roger -- 10/20/08 3:05pm
Well Roger, we simply... -- ray -- 10/20/08 4:01pm
Re: Well Roger, we simply... -- Roger -- 10/20/08 4:05pm
Uh, simply, I see no need to as... -- ray -- 10/20/08 6:31pm
Re: Uh, simply, I see no need to as... -- Roger -- 10/20/08 6:44pm
Re: Come on Ray -- BMD -- 10/19/08 10:43pm
I would agree... -- ray -- 10/20/08 2:29pm
Litmus test semantics -- MilwaukeeMike -- 10/19/08 7:37pm
Re: Litmus test semantics -- georgiajan -- 10/19/08 7:55pm
Re: Litmus test semantics -- BMD -- 10/19/08 10:50pm
Roe was wrong! -- ray -- 10/19/08 8:22pm
Supreme Court legislating from the bench -- MilwaukeeMike -- 10/19/08 10:42pm
Uh...the issue was one of federalism -- ray -- 10/20/08 2:18pm
Re: Uh...the issue was one of federalism -- Roger -- 10/20/08 2:30pm
Ah....but you know McCain never said that *NM* -- ray -- 10/19/08 7:42pm
Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h -- Roger -- 10/19/08 5:06pm
Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h -- ray -- 10/19/08 6:22pm
Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h -- Roger -- 10/19/08 6:31pm
Well, I would say... -- ray -- 10/19/08 7:30pm
Re: Well, I would say... -- Roger -- 10/19/08 7:49pm
Thanks again *NM* -- ray -- 10/19/08 8:24pm
Re: Candidate topic not yet addressed: rights of h -- queenb -- 10/19/08 1:29pm
Ummm, did you read any of it? -- Lola -- 10/19/08 1:38pm
This is one of the topics that. . . -- Col. Andy & "Wildcat" Pam -- 10/19/08 2:50pm