I don't have a specialty MM - if you vistited my site, a simple read of the first sentence makes that abundantly clear. PA does no allow specialties except in limted areas, Constituional law not being one of them.

Simply citing a bunch of cases doses not negate my main point which you completely miss. I suggest a good lesson in federalistic principles which is what I was advocating -you miss that part of Constitutional law. Your prescription: put power the framer's intended to leave to the states in the hands of the federal government, a Dem attitude which simply removes liberties of the several states, antithetical to the Constitution, federalism and the framer's CLEAR intent.

You are of the "living - breathing" ilk. I am a strict constructionist...the normal difference of right and left thinking....always happy to be on the right side of the argument and advocate protection of our governing docs and federalism.

By the way, there are already four states where you cannot even get an abortion today as should be their right despite my disagreement with them. Not for me to say though, that is what the people of those states want or it would not be so. So much for Roe.