...very simply Katie, perahps you can tell me what those two freaks had to do with my post? What is it that Roger was trying to say? Roger barks back with a negative story in his usual partisan retort and uses an example of two scumbag freaks who are most likely racists and most likely murderers as if they are examples of Republicans, right? Something that is completely out of left field; an isolated inicdent that has nothing to do with me, the psot or the Republicans. Do I neecd to really guess what his motives were considering the rhetoric as in IG's post or your comment about milk prices and Bush? That story was brought up here befiore and associated with Republicans...right? In fact I psoted the story and people alleged it was due to Republicans, right?
I psoted something postive inidacting we all had a long way to go right?..we being Dems and Repubs. Isn't it clear what Roger is getting at? Roger responds negatively to just about anything that people say from one side of the political spectrum...if not always. He even argues with me when I am happy we agree on something arguing we don't agree. He does the same even if I post a fact, someone else's quote, or a link. Sorry if I don't get that and it disgusts me and as I wonder why he needs to do as he does. I am a ta loss of why he is driven the way he is and can only assume his parents must have done something awful to be that unbelievably negative and controlling. Isn't that question rather logical in light of what he does? Why don't you ask Roger what he was getting at and what his purpose was. No need to answer, same reason you IG and Roger and others give Lola a hard time. Same reason you guys gave Brenada a hard time or anyone who does not go along with the rhetoric. Party affiliation.
Sorry Katie, I would love to write more, but I gotta get packing...i got a guy meeting me at the ariport on Tuesday I gott a get ready for...you know that Jamaican fellow that Rhonda referred to...LOL.
Any other questions Katie? If so, they will just have to wait.