Whether what you say about the book in this post is true or not has absolutely nothing to do with the issues raised in Malkin's article. Michelle Malkin is very good at what she does and further is entitled to her opinions in her book. Here, in the Lola referenced article, she reports facts and provides information.
Rather than judge the writer, is it not better to examine the content which shows the relationships between acorn and obama? Or are people really not the slightest bit interested about whether there is a relationship with this awful organization. Or if Obama and the Obama campaign are lying to the American voters or not? Mr Obama can run but he can't hide, he can duck but he can't cover unless everyone continues to keep a blind eye and dismiss what is right in front of the face.