"I don't know why the DNC and Obama don't blah blah blah (you fill in the blanks) is just pathetic as an attack methodology. When any person of 10 IQ or higher but not to exceed 50 can ask such an inane question concerning evidence and suporting documents that have been answered over and over again.....documented....sworn to...and accepted as factual by people with IQs over 51, where is the controversy?
Ahhhh, I see the "controversy" is in simply questioning the factual basis of the evidence. A ploy a GOOD lawyer might use to defend a BAD client. I guess the question as well as the obvious answer was simply rhetorical or perhaps just oxymoronic. I rest my case and demand "Life for my Client!". GOP R.I.P.!