LOL...this is NOT valid proof. Note that the Certification No. has been blackened out and that at the bottom it states clearly that "ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE". LOL ....you guys crack me up...you provide a pictire of an alleged document that itself invalidates the alleged proof. While many of you are good at attacking one's spelling, ti seems some of you have trouble reading.
Why doesn't Obama just provde the long copy birth certificate and a release for the institution to provide records from where he was born? Why does he supply an inavalid copy produced allegedly produced in 2007 as proof? Why did the campaign obtain such, not release it for a year after numerous requests, and then state they just obtained it? Why did the copy sent to a Senator have a bleed through the paper of the date stamped on the back when the office said it was unusual. These are legitimate questions. Why will he not allow the state of Hawaii to answer questions about this and his birth and verify the information? If it was as simple as you seem to suggest with this document, don't you think that this case would have been dismissed already? Don't you think that Mr. Obama would simply provide this and ask for a declaratroy judgment that he was born in Hawaii? Why won't he? The most logical conclusion is taht there is something damaging, perhaps so much so that it will prove he is inelligible to be President. I am not saying this is the case or that there is actual merit to the case. I am simply saying that Obama is refusing to answer the questions, provide proof and put it to rest once and for all which leaves open one serious question: Why?